• To Be- Or Not To Be-?
Friday, 13 January 2012 Leave a comment
At the New Year, a member of the family tried to get a word past the rest of us in Scrabble. His logic for ‘bedot’ was inescapable (he said that it’s what you do when you put dots all over something, like a wall). But we said that it didn’t exist. And it doesn’t. The Shorter OED does have ‘bedote’, though that means something else. Then yesterday I tweeted an updated definition of a related word, which does exist:
• to bespot to do Damien Hirst’s work for him
My computer keeps trying to change ‘bespot’ to ‘besot’ … to make sottish, dull or stupid. No comment.
All this got me thinking about ‘be-‘ words and as a result I’ve just spent a bewitching half an hour over an early lunch, scouring my Chambers dictionary. I found some 200 ‘be-‘ words, around 1/3 of which are more or less in current usage, such as: becalmed, befall, befit, begin, behave, behead, belabour, beleaguered, belong, bemuse, bequeath, beseech, besmirch, bespoke, betide, between, betwixt.
The ‘be-‘ varies quite a bit in significance, sometimes reinforcing the meaning of the stem word, sometimes contradicting it (‘behead’). Sometimes the stem word itself has no separate currency: ‘queath’ no longer exists, but apparently it came from the same stem as ‘quoth’. By return, though, ‘bequoth’ doesn’t exist either, although I rather like the sound of it. Ah, language!
The greatest fun was coming across words new to me. Here are ten of my favourites, which I might just try to use:
• beblubbered disfigured by weeping
• to beduck to plunge under water
• to bedung to befoul with manure
• to begunk to trick, befool, jape
• to bekiss to cover with kisses
• to bemad to madden
• to beprose to discuss in prose and tediously
• to besing to celebrate in song
• to bespeed to help on
• to bethwack to thrash soundly
How about promoting some new ‘be-‘ words? I think I ought to start with ‘bedot’. Any other suggestions?